The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Making sense of discrepancies in working memory training experiments: a Monte Carlo simulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00161 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Moreau |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 26% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 17 | 49% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 17% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,708,529
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#466
of 1,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,664
of 237,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#25
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.