↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous fMRI default mode network fluctuations both positively and negatively correlate with individual transfer of learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endogenous fMRI default mode network fluctuations both positively and negatively correlate with individual transfer of learning
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Kaplan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 33%
Psychology 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,310,081
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#958
of 1,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,934
of 361,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.