↓ Skip to main content

BASCO: a toolbox for task-related functional connectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BASCO: a toolbox for task-related functional connectivity
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Göttlich, Frederike Beyer, Ulrike M. Krämer

Abstract

BASCO (BetA Series COrrelation) is a user-friendly MATLAB toolbox with a graphical user interface (GUI) which allows investigating functional connectivity in event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Connectivity analyses extend and compliment univariate activation analyses since the actual interaction between brain regions involved in a task can be explored. BASCO supports seed-based functional connectivity as well as brain network analyses. Although there are a multitude of advanced toolboxes for investigating resting-state functional connectivity, BASCO is the first toolbox for evaluating task-related whole-brain functional connectivity employing a large number of network nodes. Thus, BASCO allows investigating task-specific rather than resting-state networks. Here, we summarize the main features of the toolbox and describe the methods and algorithms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 32%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 30%
Psychology 34 26%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,154,506
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#577
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,415
of 267,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.