↓ Skip to main content

Visually Evoked Spiking Evolves While Spontaneous Ongoing Dynamics Persist

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visually Evoked Spiking Evolves While Spontaneous Ongoing Dynamics Persist
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raoul Huys, Viktor K. Jirsa, Ziauddin Darokhan, Sonata Valentiniene, Per E. Roland

Abstract

Neurons in the primary visual cortex spontaneously spike even when there are no visual stimuli. It is unknown whether the spiking evoked by visual stimuli is just a modification of the spontaneous ongoing cortical spiking dynamics or whether the spontaneous spiking state disappears and is replaced by evoked spiking. This study of laminar recordings of spontaneous spiking and visually evoked spiking of neurons in the ferret primary visual cortex shows that the spiking dynamics does not change: the spontaneous spiking as well as evoked spiking is controlled by a stable and persisting fixed point attractor. Its existence guarantees that evoked spiking return to the spontaneous state. However, the spontaneous ongoing spiking state and the visual evoked spiking states are qualitatively different and are separated by a threshold (separatrix). The functional advantage of this organization is that it avoids the need for a system reorganization following visual stimulation, and impedes the transition of spontaneous spiking to evoked spiking and the propagation of spontaneous spiking from layer 4 to layers 2-3.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 11%
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Mathematics 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,377,140
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#744
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,923
of 393,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.