The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Traumatic Brain Injury As a Systems Neuroscience Problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Han-Chiao I. Chen, John F. Burke, Akiva S. Cohen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,175,465
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#497
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,695
of 419,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.