Title |
The Role of Monoaminergic Neurotransmission for Metabolic Control in the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00060 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yong Li, Lasse Tiedemann, Jakob von Frieling, Stella Nolte, Samar El-Kholy, Flora Stephano, Christoph Gelhaus, Iris Bruchhaus, Christine Fink, Thomas Roeder |
Abstract |
Hormones control various metabolic traits comprising fat deposition or starvation resistance. Here we show that two invertebrate neurohormones, octopamine (OA) and tyramine (TA) as well as their associated receptors, had a major impact on these metabolic traits. Animals devoid of the monoamine OA develop a severe obesity phenotype. Using flies defective in the expression of receptors for OA and TA, we aimed to decipher the contributions of single receptors for these metabolic phenotypes. Whereas those animals impaired in octß1r, octß2r and tar1 share the obesity phenotype of OA-deficient (tβh-deficient) animals, the octß1r, octß2r deficient flies showed reduced insulin release, which is opposed to the situation found in tβh-deficient animals. On the other hand, OAMB deficient flies were leaner than controls, implying that the regulation of this phenotype is more complex than anticipated. Other phenotypes seen in tβh-deficient animals, such as the reduced ability to perform complex movements tasks can mainly be attributed to the octß2r. Tissue-specific RNAi experiments revealed a very complex interorgan communication leading to the different metabolic phenotypes observed in OA or OA and TA-deficient flies. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 22% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 18% |
Chemistry | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |