The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Compatibility Evaluation of Clustering Algorithms for Contemporary Extracellular Neural Spike Sorting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rakesh Veerabhadrappa, Masood Ul Hassan, James Zhang, Asim Bhatti |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 8 | 23% |
Engineering | 4 | 11% |
Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Energy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,544,312
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#398
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,643
of 402,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#30
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.