You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidural Electrical Stimulation of the Lumbosacral Spinal Cord Improves Trunk Stability During Seated Reaching in Two Humans With Severe Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2020.569337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Gill, Margaux Linde, Kalli Fautsch, Rena Hale, Cesar Lopez, Daniel Veith, Jonathan Calvert, Lisa Beck, Kristin Garlanger, Reggie Edgerton, Dimitry Sayenko, Igor Lavrov, Andrew Thoreson, Peter Grahn, Kristin Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 10 | 19% |
| Engineering | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,462,927
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#834
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,244
of 507,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.