The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prolonged Targeted Cardiovascular Epidural Stimulation Improves Immunological Molecular Profile: A Case Report in Chronic Severe Spinal Cord Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2020.571011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ona Bloom, Jill M. Wecht, Bonnie E. Legg Ditterline, Siqi Wang, Alexander V. Ovechkin, Claudia A. Angeli, Anthony A. Arcese, Susan J. Harkema |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 8 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,159,769
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#261
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,267
of 437,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.