↓ Skip to main content

Alterations of Spinal Epidural Stimulation-Enabled Stepping by Descending Intentional Motor Commands and Proprioceptive Inputs in Humans With Spinal Cord Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alterations of Spinal Epidural Stimulation-Enabled Stepping by Descending Intentional Motor Commands and Proprioceptive Inputs in Humans With Spinal Cord Injury
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2020.590231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan L. Gill, Margaux B. Linde, Rena F. Hale, Cesar Lopez, Kalli J. Fautsch, Jonathan S. Calvert, Daniel D. Veith, Lisa A. Beck, Kristin L. Garlanger, Dimitry G. Sayenko, Igor A. Lavrov, Andrew R. Thoreson, Peter J. Grahn, Kristin D. Zhao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 23%
Engineering 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,893,553
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#270
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,256
of 505,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.