The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pointing in cervical dystonia patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1306387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Paola Tramonti Fantozzi, Roberta Benedetti, Alessandra Crecchi, Lucia Briscese, Paolo Andre, Pieranna Arrighi, Luca Bonfiglio, Maria Chiara Carboncini, Luca Bruschini, Paolo Bongioanni, Ugo Faraguna, Diego Manzoni |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,659,463
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,101
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,529
of 245,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them