↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness as a Weight Loss Treatment for Veterans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mindfulness as a Weight Loss Treatment for Veterans
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2016.00030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael V. Stanton, Justin Matsuura, Jennifer Kaci Fairchild, Jessica A. Lohnberg, Peter J. Bayley

Abstract

Despite substantial evidence for their effectiveness in treating disordered eating and obesity, mindfulness-based treatments have not been broadly implemented among Veterans. A number of reviews have reported mindfulness to be beneficial in promoting healthy eating behaviors and weight loss among non-Veteran samples. We discuss this approach in the context of the Veterans Affairs system, the largest integrated healthcare provider in the U.S. and in the context of Veterans, among whom obesity is at epidemic proportions. In this article, we discuss what is known about treating obesity using a mindfulness approach, mindfulness interventions for Veterans, a new pilot mindfulness-based weight loss program designed for Veterans, and future directions for this type of obesity treatment in Veterans. We conclude that this population may be uniquely poised to benefit from mindfulness-based treatments.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,467,278
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,040
of 4,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,394
of 344,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.