↓ Skip to main content

Flexitarian Diets and Health: A Review of the Evidence-Based Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 7,341)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
152 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
58 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
537 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flexitarian Diets and Health: A Review of the Evidence-Based Literature
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2016.00055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J. Derbyshire

Abstract

A flexitarian or semi-vegetarian diet (SVD) is one that is primarily vegetarian with the occasional inclusion of meat or fish. Of late, there appears to be an increasing movement toward this practice. There has not been a recent update on these diets from a health perspective. Using the National Centre for Biotechnology Information PubMed database, a search was made for all studies published between 2000 and 2016 that met defined inclusion criteria. A total of 25 studies were located with 12 focusing on body weight and diet quality. There was emerging evidence suggestive of benefits for body weight, improved markers of metabolic health, blood pressure, and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. SVD may also have a role to play in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn's disease. Given that there is a higher tendency for females to be flexitarian yet males are more likely to overconsume meat, there is a clear need to communicate the potential health benefits of these diets to males.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 535 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 102 19%
Student > Master 95 18%
Researcher 41 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 3%
Other 47 9%
Unknown 200 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 63 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 4%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Other 112 21%
Unknown 217 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#12,005
of 26,178,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#7
of 7,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191
of 426,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.