You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Soy-Based Therapeutic Baby Formulas: Testable Hypotheses Regarding the Pros and Cons
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2016.00059 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cara J. Westmark |
Abstract |
Soy-based infant formulas have been consumed in the United States since 1909, and currently constitute a significant portion of the infant formula market. There are efforts underway to generate genetically modified soybeans that produce therapeutic agents of interest with the intent to deliver those agents in a soy-based infant formula platform. The threefold purpose of this review article is to first discuss the pros and cons of soy-based infant formulas, then present testable hypotheses to discern the suitability of a soy platform for drug delivery in babies, and finally start a discussion to inform public policy on this important area of infant nutrition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 17% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 30 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,483,897
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,423
of 5,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,197
of 422,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.