↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Acrylamide and the Risks of Developing Cancer: Facts to Ponder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary Acrylamide and the Risks of Developing Cancer: Facts to Ponder
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2018.00014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaya Kumar, Srijit Das, Seong Lin Teoh

Abstract

Acrylamide (AA) is a water soluble white crystalline solid commonly used in industries. It was listed as an industrial chemical with potential carcinogenic properties. However to date, AA was used to produce polyacrylamide polymer, which was widely used as a coagulant in water treatment; additives during papermaking; grouting material for dams, tunnels, and other underground building constructions. AA in food could be formed during high-temperature cookingviaseveral mechanisms, i.e., formationviaacrylic acid which may be derived from the degradation of lipid, carbohydrates, or free amino acids; formationviathe dehydration/decarboxylation of organic acids (malic acid, lactic acid, and citric acid); and direct formation from amino acids. The big debate is whether this compound is toxic to human beings or not. In the present review, we discuss the formation of AA in food products, its consumption, and possible link to the development of any cancers. We discuss the body enzymatic influence on AA and mechanism of action of AA on hormone, calcium signaling pathways, and cytoskeletal filaments. We also highlight the deleterious effects of AA on nervous system, reproductive system, immune system, and the liver. The present and future mitigation strategies are also discussed. The present review on AA may be beneficial for researchers, food industry, and also medical personnel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 23%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Researcher 9 5%
Lecturer 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 64 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 76 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,182,694
of 26,253,210 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#567
of 7,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,411
of 347,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,253,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.