↓ Skip to main content

When Utilitarian Claims Backfire: Advertising Content and the Uptake of Insects as Food

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 7,377)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
69 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Utilitarian Claims Backfire: Advertising Content and the Uptake of Insects as Food
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2018.00088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Berger, Christian Bärtsch, Christina Schmidt, Fabian Christandl, Annika M. Wyss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 7%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 58 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 597. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#40,308
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#25
of 7,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#762
of 358,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.