You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antidiabetic and Antiobesity Potential of Selected Traditional Medicinal Plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2019.00053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satvir Sekhon-Loodu, H. P. Vasantha Rupasinghe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 278 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 130 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 139 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,006,658
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#993
of 4,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,340
of 350,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#30
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.