The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Activity Based Anorexia as an Animal Model for Anorexia Nervosa–A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2019.00069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martha A. Schalla, Andreas Stengel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 18 | 15% |
| Psychology | 15 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,615,845
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,349
of 6,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,036
of 355,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#45
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.