You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zinc Biofortified Rice Varieties: Challenges, Possibilities, and Progress in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.00026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Sanjeeva Rao, C. N. Neeraja, P. Madhu Babu, B. Nirmala, K. Suman, L. V. Subba Rao, K. Surekha, P. Raghu, T. Longvah, P. Surendra, Rajesh Kumar, V. Ravindra Babu, S. R. Voleti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,008,318
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,296
of 7,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,418
of 401,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#41
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.