You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms Underlying Biological Effects of Cruciferous Glucosinolate-Derived Isothiocyanates/Indoles: A Focus on Metabolic Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.00111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Montserrat Esteve |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| India | 2 | 14% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,140,127
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#440
of 6,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,481
of 405,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#13
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.