The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of Maternal Dietary n-3 LCPUFA Supplementation as a Primary Strategy to Reduce Offspring Obesity: Lessons From the INFAT Trial and Implications for Future Research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.00156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dorothy Marie Meyer, Christina Brei, Bernhard Lorenz Bader, Hans Hauner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,499,715
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,159
of 4,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,502
of 402,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#66
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.