The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Effects of Intraduodenal Glucose and Fat Infusion on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Type 2 Diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.582314 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cong Xie, Xuyi Wang, Karen L. Jones, Michael Horowitz, Zilin Sun, Tanya J. Little, Christopher K. Rayner, Tongzhi Wu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 38% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,998,814
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,638
of 4,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,641
of 418,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#62
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.