The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correlations Between Parental Lines and Indica Hybrid Rice in Terms of Eating Quality Traits
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.583997 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yan Peng, Bigang Mao, Changquan Zhang, Ye Shao, Tianhao Wu, Liming Hu, Yuanyi Hu, Li Tang, Yaokui Li, Bingran Zhao, Wenbang Tang, Yinghui Xiao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#20,676,689
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,755
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#429,482
of 503,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#134
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.