The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-Selection Bias: An Essential Design Consideration for Nutrition Trials in Healthy Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.587983 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren M. Young, Sarah Gauci, Andrew Scholey, David J. White, Andrew Pipingas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 29% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,227,578
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#519
of 6,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,108
of 424,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#16
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.