The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Olfactory Cues in Infant Feeds: Volatile Profiles of Different Milks Fed to Preterm Infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.603090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Muelbert, Frank H. Bloomfield, Shikha Pundir, Jane E. Harding, Chris Pook |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,405,648
of 25,270,999 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,104
of 6,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,854
of 553,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#68
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,270,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 553,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.