The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Approaches for Health Effect Characterization in Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods: A Comparative Case Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.607929 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sofie Theresa Thomsen, Maarten Nauta, Lea Sletting Jakobsen, Marianne Uhre Jakobsen, Heddie Mejborn, Malene Outzen, Morten Poulsen, Gitte Ravn-Haren, Rikke Andersen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,779
of 4,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,706
of 439,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#249
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.