The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Differential Threshold of Breakfast, Caffeine and Food Groups May Be Impacting Mental Well-Being in Young Adults: The Mediation Effect of Exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.676604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lina Begdache, Hamed Kianmehr, Helen Najjar, Dylan Witt, Nasim S. Sabounchi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,145,865
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,302
of 6,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,176
of 431,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#83
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.