The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of Vitamin D, Zinc and Selenium Related Genetic Variants With COVID-19 Disease Severity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.689419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikola Kotur, Anita Skakic, Kristel Klaassen, Vladimir Gasic, Branka Zukic, Vesna Skodric-Trifunovic, Mihailo Stjepanovic, Zorica Zivkovic, Olivera Ostojic, Goran Stevanovic, Lidija Lavadinovic, Sonja Pavlovic, Biljana Stankovic |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Turkey | 3 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 52 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#876,715
of 26,485,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#459
of 7,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,857
of 465,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#31
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.