↓ Skip to main content

Sprout Caffeoylquinic Acid Profiles as Affected by Variety, Cooking, and Storage

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sprout Caffeoylquinic Acid Profiles as Affected by Variety, Cooking, and Storage
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2021.748001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gholamreza Khaksar, Ketthida Cheevarungnapakul, Patwira Boonjing, Supaart Sirikantaramas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#20,231,392
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,432
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406,689
of 497,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#360
of 492 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 492 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.