The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association Between the EAT-Lancet Diet Pattern and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.784018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chenjie Xu, Zhi Cao, Hongxi Yang, Yabing Hou, Xiaohe Wang, Yaogang Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Researcher | 2 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 48 | 73% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 51 | 77% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,215,082
of 26,491,309 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,049
of 7,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,981
of 535,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#74
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,491,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.