↓ Skip to main content

Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies differentially expressed phosphorylation sites that affect muscle fiber type in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies differentially expressed phosphorylation sites that affect muscle fiber type in pigs
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.1006739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu He, Xiaofan Tan, Hongqiang Li, Zhiwei Yan, Jing Chen, Ruixue Zhao, David M. Irwin, Wangjun Wu, Shuyi Zhang, Bojiang Li

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,622,845
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,741
of 4,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,896
of 424,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#405
of 578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.