The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dietary quality indices and recurrent chronic kidney disease in Taiwanese post-renal transplant recipients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.1023000 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
I-Hsin Lin, Te-Chih Wong, Tuyen Van Duong, Shih-Wei Nien, I-Hsin Tseng, Hsu-Han Wang, Yang-Jen Chiang, Shwu-Huey Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,761,844
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,812
of 4,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,629
of 424,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#360
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.