The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coffee intake may promote sudomotor function activation via the contribution of caffeine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.1051828 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryeo-Won Kwon, Jin-Sun Park, Ha-Gyoung Lee, Jong-In Park, Eon-Ah Choo, Seung-Jea Lee, Jeong-Beom Lee |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#255,900
of 23,971,024 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#104
of 5,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,563
of 461,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,971,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.