The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inclusion of carotenoids in dietary habits as an alternative to prevent age-related macular degeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.1063517 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iván Antonio García-Montalvo, Diana Matías-Pérez, Emilio Hernández-Bautista, Eduardo Pérez-Campos |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Other | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,886,638
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#863
of 7,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,658
of 484,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#58
of 563 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 563 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.