↓ Skip to main content

Daily Food Insecurity Predicts Lower Positive and Higher Negative Affect: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Daily Food Insecurity Predicts Lower Positive and Higher Negative Affect: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.790519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muzi Na, Nan Dou, Yujie Liao, Sara Jimenez Rincon, Lori A. Francis, Jennifer E. Graham-Engeland, Laura E. Murray-Kolb, Runze Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 10 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,767,805
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,736
of 5,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,390
of 441,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#347
of 622 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 622 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.