↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass Predicts Poor Survival After Gastric Cancer Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postoperative Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass Predicts Poor Survival After Gastric Cancer Surgery
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.794576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shanjun Tan, Qiulin Zhuang, Zhige Zhang, Shuhao Li, Jiahao Xu, Junjie Wang, Yanni Zhang, Qiulei Xi, Qingyang Meng, Yi Jiang, Guohao Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,148,446
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,372
of 4,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,192
of 508,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#282
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.