The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.811103 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katherine M. Livingstone, Catherine M. Milte, Susie Macfarlane, Julie Woods, Alison Booth |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,663,847
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,910
of 5,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,629
of 444,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#223
of 632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.