The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Managing Nutrition Impact Symptoms in Cancer Cachexia: A Case Series and Mini Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.831934 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam Khorasanchi, Srinidhi Nemani, Sudeep Pandey, Egidio Del Fabbro |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,106,097
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,781
of 7,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,469
of 456,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#157
of 620 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 620 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.