↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of Muscle Quality in Hybrid Grouper (♀ Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × ♂ Epinephelus lanceolatu) Due to Oxidative Damage Caused by Ingestion of Oxidized Fish Oil

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Degradation of Muscle Quality in Hybrid Grouper (♀ Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × ♂ Epinephelus lanceolatu) Due to Oxidative Damage Caused by Ingestion of Oxidized Fish Oil
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.840535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaobo Yan, Zhihao Li, Xiaohui Dong, Beiping Tan, Simiao Pan, Tao Li, Shuisheng Long, Weibin Huang, Xiangxiang Suo, Yuanzhi Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,009,721
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,336
of 4,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,919
of 553,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#307
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 553,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.