You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Human Compared to a Non-intervention Diet and Caloric Restriction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.871682 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lihu Gu, Rongrong Fu, Jiaze Hong, Haixiang Ni, Kepin Yu, Haiying Lou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 69 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 75 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#229,354
of 26,238,332 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#146
of 7,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,620
of 451,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#8
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.