The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cellulose Nanofibers Extracted From Natural Wood Improve the Postharvest Appearance Quality of Apples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.881783 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yongxu Wang, Jing Zhang, Xinjie Wang, Tingting Zhang, Fujun Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Wensheng Gao, Chunxiang You, Xiaofei Wang, Kun Yu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,914
of 4,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,890
of 437,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#403
of 663 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 663 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.