The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of two front-of-pack nutrition labels for Brazilian consumers using a smartphone app in a real-world grocery store: A pilot randomized controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.898021 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alessandro Rangel Carolino Sales Silva, Cliona Ni Mhurchu, Lucilene Rezende Anastácio |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,236,411
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,005
of 4,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,053
of 432,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#76
of 673 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 673 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.