The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of an Antibiotic Cocktail for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Mouse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.918098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jijun Tan, Jiatai Gong, Fengcheng Liu, Baizhen Li, Zhanfeng Li, Jiaming You, Jianhua He, Shusong Wu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,773,420
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,739
of 4,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,735
of 441,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#369
of 684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.