The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infant Formula With a Specific Blend of Five Human Milk Oligosaccharides Drives the Gut Microbiota Development and Improves Gut Maturation Markers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.920362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miroslava Bosheva, Istvan Tokodi, Aleksander Krasnow, Helle Krogh Pedersen, Oksana Lukjancenko, Aron C. Eklund, Dominik Grathwohl, Norbert Sprenger, Bernard Berger, Colin I. Cercamondi, 5 HMO Study Investigator Consortium, Viktor Bauer, Malgorzata Arciszewska, Maria Tarneva, Irina Popova, Svilen Dosev, Sirma Dimitrova, Olga Nikolova, Marzena Nowak, Magdalena Szuflinska-Sidorowicz, Bartosz Korczowski, Rositsa Karcheva-Beloeva, Stefan Banov, Boguslawa Cimoszko, Wieslaw Olechowski, Robert Simko, Zsuzsanna Tengelyi, Piotr Korbal, Marta Zolnowska, Anton Bilev, Georgios Vasilopoulos, Sylwia Korzynska, István Laki, Margarita Koleva-Syarova, Toni Grigorov, Steliyana Kraeva, Éva Kovács, Rada Markova, Grazyna Jasieniak-Pinis, Katalin Fister, Tatyana Stoeva |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,509,188
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#731
of 7,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,097
of 443,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#44
of 687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.