The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Causal relationship between tea intake and cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.938201 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ning Gao, Ming Ni, Jiangwei Song, Minjian Kong, Dongdong Wei, Aiqiang Dong |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,059,458
of 26,246,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,740
of 7,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,090
of 441,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#132
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,246,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.