The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The prognostic impact of preoperative body mass index changes for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy: A large-scale long-term follow-up cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.947008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi-Min Gu, Qi-Xin Shang, Han-Lu Zhang, Yu-Shang Yang, Wen-Ping Wang, Yong Yuan, Yang Hu, Guo-Wei Che, Long-Qi Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,738,791
of 23,341,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,804
of 4,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,310
of 444,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#453
of 641 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,341,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 641 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.