The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the protective roles of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on nanomaterial-induced toxicity: A meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.991524 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaogang Luo, Dongli Xie, Tong Wu, Wei Xu, Qingyang Meng, Kangli Cao, Jianchen Hu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,084,070
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,572
of 7,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,948
of 437,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#190
of 660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.