The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between visceral adiposity index and kidney stones in American adults: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2007–2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.994669 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiahao Wang, Zhenzhen Yang, Yunjin Bai, Shan Yin, Jianwei Cui, Yunfei Xiao, Jia Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,967,733
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,416
of 5,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,084
of 437,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#379
of 636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.