↓ Skip to main content

Timed restricted feeding cycles drive daily rhythms in female rats maintained in constant light but only partially restore the estrous cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timed restricted feeding cycles drive daily rhythms in female rats maintained in constant light but only partially restore the estrous cycle
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.999156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalí N. Guerrero-Vargas, Estefania Espitia-Bautista, Rene Escalona, Haydée Lugo-Martínez, Mariana Gutiérrez-Pérez, Raful Navarro-Espíndola, María Fernanda Setién, Sebastián Boy-Waxman, Elizabeth Angélica Retana-Flores, Berenice Ortega, Ruud M. Buijs, Carolina Escobar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 28%
Psychology 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,511,761
of 25,248,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,697
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,058
of 429,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#141
of 646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.