The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beneficial insights into postbiotics against colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1111872 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dingka Song, Xiuli Wang, Yongjing Ma, Ning-Ning Liu, Hui Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,912,325
of 26,381,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#899
of 7,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,921
of 432,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#54
of 554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.